The true costs of managing employee benefits
Every hour spent on case builds is an hour not spent advising the employer counting on you.
When employee benefits become a burden
Today's employers can choose from a wide array of benefits options. To act as consultative partners, brokers and general health insurance agencies have to track microtrends in the benefits segment alongside broader market shifts. States are constantly revising insurance mandates and regulations and staying current on national and state specifics is what lets an agency advise employers well and hold a competitive portfolio.
General health insurance agencies and brokers know the day-to-day struggle of manual employee benefit administration. But many firms underestimate the true costs of these traditional approaches, relying on manual work for critical tasks like spreadsheeting plan designs and quotes, eligibility processing, benefit administration case builds, or data audits.
The ripple effects of manual benefit administration
One analysis shows that account managers can spend up to 60% of their time on manual processes that could be automated during the busy season. The true costs run well past the time itself. Here's how manual processes compound through each phase of the benefits lifecycle and create cascading inefficiencies for agencies and the employers they serve.
Pre-renewal
Pre-renewal requires careful analysis and thoughtful preparation, but account managers often face strategic planning challenges that shape the year ahead. Over 52% of the 375 employers interviewed in Zywave's 2024 Broker Services Survey said they wanted trusted advisors, not "insurance salespeople," to keep them abreast of compliance trends and help them understand various forms of insurance and risk transfer strategies. Despite that, many account managers spend the pre-renewal phase on administrative work:
- Market analysis and benchmarking become time-consuming exercises in data gathering
- Claims analysis requires manual compilation and review of multiple data sources
- Plan design recommendations arrive late because of time spent on administrative tasks
- Funding arrangement evaluations lack the depth of analysis needed
- Compliance reviews can miss critical details because the review is manual
Account managers end up playing catch-up before the cycle begins, which compromises their ability to think strategically. That means missed chances to improve plan design and reduce costs for employers and their employees.
Renewal
Time is what runs short during the renewal phase. Account managers have to balance the detailed analysis renewals require against the pressing demands of current employers, and both usually suffer.
- Account managers struggle to pull renewals while managing current workload
- Alternative carrier marketing gets rushed because of administrative backlog
- Quote comparisons take longer, and the best fit for a client can be missed
- Cost projections require extensive manual calculations, increasing error risk
- Executive presentations are delayed by time spent on manual tasks
These bottlenecks force account managers into rushed decisions or a weaker fit for the client. The pressure to finish renewals on time while staying accurate creates an environment where strategic thinking gives way to administrative necessity.
Open enrollment
Open enrollment is the most visible period in the cycle, and the point at which employees make their decisions. Manual burdens set off a cascade of operational problems. The workload delays response times on urgent employer needs, and time pressure raises error rates across every process. A few of the tasks that stand between account managers and consistent service:
- A typical case build for a mid-sized employer with multiple plan offerings can consume up to 20 hours
- Benefits administration system set up stalls while documents and information are tracked down
- EDI connectivity issues take longer to resolve
- Employee communication materials get rushed or simplified
- Decision support tools go partly unused because setup takes too long
The consequences reach past the enrollment period. A poor experience here damages employer relationships, creates ongoing administrative headaches and generates employee dissatisfaction that persists through the year. These impacts are felt most at small and mid-sized businesses (SMBs), where human resources (HR) employees often handle multiple responsibilities. According to The Hartford's Future of Benefits Study, HR leaders at SMBs manage an average of eight different job functions, from recruiting and benefits administration to compliance and technology integration. With that much to carry, strategic planning takes a back seat to daily operations. This is where trusted brokers become essential partners. Benefit decision-makers at SMBs rely on their brokers to build and run competitive programs.
Post-enrollment
Post-enrollment and ongoing administration may seem less intense than open enrollment, but the phase demands consistent attention to detail and prompt response. Employers expect quick answers, and when they have questions or concerns they turn to their brokers. Zywave found that 57% of employers identified prompt, effective service and timely answers to questions as the most important criteria for selecting a broker. Nearly 83% wanted to hear from their brokers weekly (38.83%) or monthly (44.15%) on certain insurance topics. Manual administrative burdens drain agency resources through this phase:
- COBRA administration faces delays and potential compliance issues
- Dependent verification becomes a bottleneck
- Billing reconciliation consumes excessive time
- Claims advocacy gets delayed by administrative overload
At one California-based general health insurance agency, account managers struggled with eligibility processing, particularly mid-year changes.
"Account managers spent about 50% of their day pulling forms from our benefits administration platform, verifying the correct information, submitting to health insurance carriers and following up," said a senior vice president of benefits consulting at the agency. The agency's efficiency challenges increased when the COVID-19 pandemic forced employers to reduce staff headcounts.
Real-world impacts: A case study in numbers
Consider a mid-sized agency with five account managers, each handling three to four case builds a month during peak season:
- 20 hours per case build
- 60 to 80 hours monthly per account manager
- 300 to 400 total monthly hours across the team
- Approximately $15,000 to $20,000 in labor costs per month
Beyond direct labor costs, agencies absorb error correction, overtime, temporary staff and lost business. One agency found that its account managers spent nearly 75% of their time on administrative tasks during peak season, leaving little room for strategic employer engagement or business development.
"I spent so much time on case builds that I couldn't focus on addressing my clients' strategic needs," said an agency account manager. "It felt like I was always playing catch-up instead of being proactive with my accounts."
What agencies gain when case builds move outside
Outsourcing case builds is more than task delegation — it allows agencies to achieve:
- Freedom for account managers to focus on employer relationships
- Elimination of a time-consuming process
- Relief from peak season pressure and overtime demands
- Consistent, reliable case build completion
- Predictable costs through straightforward pricing
By taking the case build burden off internal teams, agencies create room for growth and better client service. Account managers report that outsourcing case builds allows them to spend more time understanding what employers need, shaping strategy and strengthening relationships. The effect is largest during busy season, when internal resources are stretched thin. Instead of juggling administrative tasks against employer demands, teams stay on what matters: serving employers well.
Measuring ROI: The business case for change
Return on investment from tech-enabled services goes past direct cost savings. The immediate financial gains matter, but the larger value is in how agency operations and service delivery change.
Immediate benefits
- 65% reduction in time spent on administrative tasks
- 90% decrease in setup errors
- Fixed, predictable pricing model
Strategic advantages
- Improved employer satisfaction through faster turnaround times
- Stronger competitive position in the market
- Better staff retention through reduced burnout
- Scalable operations without proportional cost increases
Brokers and general agencies should weigh both the quantitative and the qualitative side. The reduction in administrative time alone often justifies the investment, and the strategic gains — better employer relationships, stronger market position and higher staff satisfaction — often prove more valuable over time.
Looking ahead: The benefits of technology adoption
The future of benefits administration belongs to agencies that embrace technology and outsourcing as a strategic advantage. Agencies adopting technology are finding openings for growth and better service that were not there before. Freed from administrative burden, account managers can:
- Develop deeper relationships with employers
- Identify new revenue opportunities
- Respond more quickly to market changes
- Scale operations efficiently
- Attract and retain top talent
That shift lets agencies position themselves as consultative partners rather than service providers. Early adopters report higher employer retention, more referrals and the ability to pursue larger, more complex accounts that were previously out of reach. The agencies that modernize benefit administration now are the ones that will hold that position.
Survival of the strategic
Brokers and general agencies have to meet employers' evolving needs while keeping pace with technology and legislative change. The inefficiencies and limits of manual processes are no longer affordable in this market. Technology adoption is a scalable way for general health insurance agencies and brokers to gain the agility needed to deliver high-touch service to carriers and employers in a complex market. By modernizing benefit administration processes, agencies can transform their operations, improve service to employers and position themselves for sustainable growth.
